User talk:Chillowack
|
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/40px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of St. Leonides, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09179a.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DYK nomination of Mystic River Reservation
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Mystic River Reservation at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jrcla2 (talk) 16:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Kraemer (composer) has been accepted
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Chillowack. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Chillowack. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Chillowack. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wendy Waldman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keane and Gary Nicholson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Sound of Freedom (film)
[edit]Some biased guy is removing the "accuracy" section from Sound of Freedom (film) 2603:6081:5C00:F109:B8D2:D353:93E5:1AFB (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know! It looks like maybe it's been restored? Chillowack (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Your have been reported
[edit]I regret to serve notice that I reported you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, under the category: Belligerent and Inappropriate Behavior from Editors. Of the two of you that I reported, I do think you seem more genuine and probably a better person, but you did lash out at other posters and assume bad faith. 2601:249:9301:FF80:A107:1D80:84AC:9A1B (talk) 00:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Are you the guy from the "Sound of Freedom" talk page who has been using a proxy to mask his IP address? I see from your talk page that this particular IP address has already been disciplined -- despite its having existed for just one day. That's pretty impressive!
- You are way ahead of me: I have never once been disciplined (or even reported) in my 15 years on Wikipedia. That might be because I genuinely love and respect Wikipedia, I do my best to follow the rules, and I've proven myself to be a legitimate editor with eleven original articles and thousands of edits to my credit -- as opposed, say, to being a troll who enters a community, doesn't respect the people in it, doesn't learn or follow the rules, and tries to smear legitimate editors with false accusations while hiding behind a proxy. Chillowack (talk) 04:38, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm neither a guy, a proxy, nor a troll, but I have only ever edited the Jacob Riis article, an article about a Rogers and Hammerstein song, and created one stub- aside from occasional grammar corrections- over a decade or so, so you've got me beat there. I'm happy that Wikipedia is the better for your contributions.
- But you are also damaging Wikipedia by being rude to newcomers. Look at what you assumed about me. Have you ever considered how many people you may be driving away with your dismissive assumptions? Isn't one of the rules to assume good faith? I know it used to be.
- On a humorous note, you can't really say you've never once been reported anymore, since I did report you. I would apologize, but judging from your comment above, I hardly think you care. And not to worry, I was banned for three months, for 'evading a block'- strange, since I never was blocked a first time. Perhaps they thought I was a proxy too.
- Either way, I find this community... less than appealing, which is why I participate so infrequently- and why I will always remain an IP editor. But good for you that you are able to find it rewarding. All the best. 2601:249:9301:FF80:19C9:D43:A686:BBAA (talk) 03:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Welcome back to Wikipedia. I hope your ban served its purpose, by allowing you to reflect on your behavior and make the necessary adjustments. I don't like to hold grudges, but I do want to point out that it was you who attacked me, by "reporting" me -- an inappropriate action IMHO, which I believe was correctly disciplined. However: I also see you "sort of" offering an apology here, and although you don't quite go all the way with it, I do appreciate the "glancing" mention at least; so if you're agreeable, I'm willing to let bygones be bygones, and move forward with a clean slate. No hard feelings? Chillowack (talk) 04:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- None at all. Pax. And thank you for the generous welcome back. 2601:249:9301:FF80:19C9:D43:A686:BBAA (talk) 04:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Welcome back to Wikipedia. I hope your ban served its purpose, by allowing you to reflect on your behavior and make the necessary adjustments. I don't like to hold grudges, but I do want to point out that it was you who attacked me, by "reporting" me -- an inappropriate action IMHO, which I believe was correctly disciplined. However: I also see you "sort of" offering an apology here, and although you don't quite go all the way with it, I do appreciate the "glancing" mention at least; so if you're agreeable, I'm willing to let bygones be bygones, and move forward with a clean slate. No hard feelings? Chillowack (talk) 04:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Happy editing! Chillowack (talk) 04:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)